P‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍eter Singer argues that just as we would be obligated to save a child drowning in a pond we passed by at moderate cost to ourselves, we are obligated to save distant strangers when doing so costs us relatively little (i.e., something on the order of one to three thousand dollars—a great deal of money in some ways, but no where near as valuable as a human life). Reconstruct Peter Singer’s argument for this conclusion and evaluate it. That i‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s, consider some objection to the argument, either of your own devising or one from an author we have read; then offer some response on behalf of Peter Singer; and finally, conclude by explaining whether the objection succeeds and why. Essay format with intro & thesis, body paragraphs and conclusion. Using your own words for paraphrasing, no quotes needed. https://personal.lse.ac.uk/robert49/teaching/mm/articles/Singer_1972Famin‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍e.pdf