skip to Main Content
The smarter way
to do assignments.

Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment posted on our website by one of our clients. If you need assistance with this question too, please click on the Order button at the bottom of the page to get started.

Question description

Clinical & Counseling PsychologyNeimeyer, G. J., Taylor, J. M., Wear, D. M.,
& Buyukgoze-Kavas, A. (2011). How special are the specialties? Workplace
settings in counseling and clinical psychology in the United States. Counseling
Psychology Quarterly, 24(1), 43-53. doi:10.1080/09515070.2011.558343 • The
full-text version of this article can be accessed through the EBSCOhost
database in the Ashford University Library. This study examined the
similarities and differences between clinical and counseling workplace settings
during early-, mid-, and late-career phases to explore the distinctiveness of
the two specialties. Article ReviewThe purpose of an article review
is to provide the academic community with a description, summary, and
evaluation of the completed work. For the article review, students will assume
the role of an expert who is critically evaluating contemporary research in the
field of psychology. Students will incorporate material from across the course,
analyzing and applying theories and principles of psychology, into a cohesive
and well-written article review. This learning activity will facilitate the
development of research skills, critical thinking, and writing skills that are
necessary to success in the field of psychology. The article for review was
chosen in Week Two of the course and must be used in this review. Carefully
read the selected article, and then write the Article Review.·Begin with a well-written
introduction to the article that:oAnalyzes the article and identifies the professional area of psychology it
representsoAssesses the roles of psychology professionals within this area and
describes whether or not the article clearly and correctly represents these
roles.·Evaluate the theoretical
perspective on which the study is based·Detail the hypotheses presented
in the study or the relationship of interest·Describe the sample(s) presented
in the study (how participants were obtained, selected, sample size, etc.)·Discuss where the study was
conducted: university setting (lab), organization (field), etc.·Examine the ethical concerns in
the study using the APA Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct as a guide.·Summarize the results of the
study. Be certain to specify the findings and whether or not the hypotheses
were supported.·Analyze the strengths and
weaknesses of the study (usually found in the discussion section of the
article).·Evaluate possible contemporary
applications of the results within the article·Create a conclusion that includes
a synopsis of professional insights about the study.In the creation of the Article
Review, it is paramount to include information in the form of peer-reviewed
research to support any statements made. A minimum of five peer-reviewed
articles, not including the article chosen for this assignment, are required
for this paper.Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Pathbrite
portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of
signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback
for this Article Review, please implement any changes recommended by the
instructor, go to Pathbrite (Links to an
external site.)Links to an external site. and upload the revised
Article Review to the portfolio. (Use the Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide to create an account if you do not already have one.) The upload of
signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain
to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio
and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual
students as a professional resource tool. See the Pathbrite (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
website for information and further instructions on using this portfolio tool.Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:·Must be three to five
double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style as outlined
in the Ashford Writing Center.·Must include a title page with
the following:oTitle of paperoStudent’s nameoCourse name and numberoInstructor’s nameoDate submitted·Must begin with an introductory
paragraph that includes an analysis of the article and identification of the
professional area of psychology it represents, as well as an assessment of the
clear description of the roles of psychology professionals within the area
presented.·Must address the topic of the
paper with critical thought.·Must end with a conclusion that
includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study.·Must use at least five
peer-reviewed sources, including a minimum of two from the Ashford University
Library. The article being reviewed will not count toward this total.·Must document all sources in APA
style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.·Must include a separate reference
page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
Center.·Description: · ·Total
Possible Score: 27.00·Introduction
Analyzes the Article and Identifies the Professional Area of Psychology it
Represents·Total: 1.25·Distinguished – The
introduction clearly and comprehensively analyzes the article and identifies
the professional area of psychology it represents.·Proficient – The
introduction analyzes the article and identifies the professional area of
psychology it represents. Minor details are missing or unclear.·Basic – The
introduction partially analyzes the article and identifies the professional
area of psychology it represents. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.·Below Expectations –
The introduction attempts to analyze the article and identifies the
professional area of psychology it represents; however, significant details are
missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance – The
analysis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
assignment instructions.· ·Introduction
Assesses the Roles of Psychology Professionals Within the Area Presented and
Describes Whether or Not the Article Clearly and Correctly Represents These
Roles·Total: 1.25·Distinguished – The
introduction provides a thorough assessment of the roles of psychology
professionals within the area presented and describes whether or not the
article clearly and correctly represents these roles.·Proficient – The
introduction assesses the roles of psychology professionals within the area presented
and describes whether or not the article clearly and correctly represents these
roles. Minor details are missing or unclear.·Basic – The
introduction provides a minimal assessment of the roles of psychology
professionals within the area presented and whether or not the article clearly
and correctly represents these roles.Relevant details are missing or unclear.·Below Expectations –
The introduction attempts to provide an assessment of the roles of psychology
professionals within the area presented and whether or not the article clearly
and correctly represents these roles; however, significant details are missing
and/or unclear.·Non-Performance -The
assessment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
assignment instructions.· ·Evaluates
the Theoretical Perspective On Which the Study is Based·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Clearly and comprehensively evaluates the theoretical perspective on which the
study is based.·Proficient – Evaluates
the theoretical perspective on which the study is based. Minor details are
missing or unclear.·Basic – Minimally
evaluates the theoretical perspective on which the study is based. Relevant
details are missing or unclear.·Below Expectations –
Attempts to evaluate the theoretical perspective on which the study is based;
however, significant details are missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance – The
evaluation of the theoretical perspective on which the study is based is either
nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.· ·Details
the Hypotheses Presented in the Study or the Relationship of Interest·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Clearly and comprehensively details the hypotheses or the relationship of
interest as presented in the study.·Proficient – Details
the hypotheses or the relationship of interest as presented in the study. Minor
details are missing or unclear.·Basic – Minimally
details the hypotheses or the relationship of interest as presented in the
study. Relevant details are missing or unclear.·Below Expectations –
Attempts to detail the hypotheses or the relationship of interest as presented
in the study; however, significant details are missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance -The
article review does not detail the hypotheses or the relationship of interest
as presented in the study or lacks the components described in the assignment
instructions.· ·Describes
the Sample(s) Presented in the Study·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Thoroughly and clearly describes the sample(s) presented in the study.·Proficient – Describes
the sample(s) presented in the study. Minor details are missing or unclear.·Basic – Minimally
describes the sample(s) presented in the study. Relevant details are missing or
unclear.·Below Expectations –
Attempts to describe the sample(s) presented in the study; however, significant
details are missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance -The
description of the sample(s) presented in the study is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.· ·Discusses
Where the Study Was Conducted·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Thoroughly and clearly discusses where the study was conducted.·Proficient – Discusses
where the study was conducted. Minor details are missing or unclear.·Basic – Minimally
discusses where the study was conducted.Relevant details are missing or
unclear.·Below Expectations –
Attempts to discuss where the study was conducted. Significant details are
missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance – The
discussion of where the study was conducted is either nonexistent or lacks the
components described in the assignment instructions.· ·Examines
the Ethical Concerns in the Study·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Thoroughly and clearly examines the ethical concerns in the study.·Proficient -Examines
the ethical concerns in the study. Minor details are missing or unclear.·Basic – Minimally
examines the ethical concerns in the study. Relevant details are missing or
unclear.·Below Expectations – Attempts
to examine the ethical concerns in the study. Significant details are missing
and/or unclear·Non-Performance – The
examination of the ethical concerns in the study is either nonexistent or lacks
the components described in the assignment instructions.· ·Summarizes
the Results of the Study Including Specific Findings and a Determination of
Whether or Not the Hypotheses Were Supported·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Comprehensively and clearly summarizes the results of the study including
specific findings and a determination of whether or not the hypotheses were
supported.·Proficient –
Summarizes the results of the study including specific findings and a
determination of whether or not the hypotheses were supported. Minor details
are missing or unclear.·Basic – Partially
summarizes the results of the study including specific findings and a
determination of whether or not the hypotheses were supported. Relevant details
are missing or unclear.·Below Expectations –
Attempts to summarize the results of the study including specific findings and
a determination of whether or not the hypotheses were supported; however,
significant details are missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance – The
summary of the results of the study is either nonexistent or lacks the components
described in the assignment instructions.· ·Analyzes
the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Study·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Clearly and thoroughly analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of the study.·Proficient – Analyzes
the strengths and weaknesses of the study. Minor details are missing or
unclear.·Basic – Partially
analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of the study. Relevant details are
missing or unclear.·Below Expectations –
Attempts to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the study; however,
significant details are missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance – The
analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the study is either nonexistent or
lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.· ·Evaluates
Possible Contemporary Applications of the Results Within the Article·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Clearly and comprehensively evaluates possible contemporary applications of the
results within the article.·Proficient – Evaluates
possible contemporary applications of the results within the article. Minor
details are missing or unclear.·Basic – Minimally
evaluates possible contemporary applications of the results within the article.
Relevant details are missing or unclear.·Below Expectations –
Attempts to evaluate possible contemporary applications of the results within
the article; significant details are missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance – The
evaluation of possible contemporary applications is either nonexistent or lacks
the components described in the assignment instructions.· ·Creates
a Conclusion That Includes a Synopsis of Professional Insights About the Study·Total: 2.00·Distinguished –
Creates a clear and comprehensive conclusion that includes a synopsis of
professional insights about the study.·Proficient – Creates a
conclusion that includes a synopsis of professional insights about the study.
Minor details are missing or unclear.·Basic – Creates a
conclusion that includes a minimal synopsis of professional insights about the
study. Relevant details are missing or unclear.·Below Expectations –
Creates a conclusion that attempts to include a synopsis of professional insights
about the study; significant details are missing and/or unclear.·Non-Performance – The
conclusion is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the
assignment instructions.· ·Critical
Thinking: Explanation of Issues·Total: 2.00·Distinguished
– Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered,
delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.·Proficient
– Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant
information for an adequate understanding.·Basic – Briefly
explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic
understanding.·Below Expectations
– Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver
additional information necessary for a basic understanding.·Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the instructions. · ·Written
Communication: Content Development·Total: 2.00·Distinguished
– Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and
develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the
work as a whole.·Proficient – Uses
appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the
discipline, shaping the work as a whole.·Basic – Uses
appropriate and pertinent content but does not apply it toward discovering or
developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.·Below Expectations
– Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic.
Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work and may
distract the reader from its purpose.·Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the instructions.· ·Written
Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics·Total: 0.75·Distinguished
– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and
mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is
very easy to understand.·Proficient
– Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as
spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is
mostly easy to understand.·Basic – Displays
basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.
Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.·Below Expectations
– Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as
spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the
reader.·Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the instructions.· ·Written
Communication: APA Formatting·Total: 0.75·Distinguished
– Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title
page, and reference page.·Proficient
– Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a
few minor errors. ·Basic – Exhibits
limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does
not meet all APA requirements. ·Below Expectations
– Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent
errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.·Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the instructions.· ·Written
Communication: Page Requirement·Total: 0.50·Distinguished
– The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of
correctly formatted pages. ·Proficient – The
length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly
formatted pages. ·Basic – The
length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required
number of correctly formatted pages.·Below Expectations
– The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the
required number of correctly formatted pages. ·Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the instructions.· ·Written
Communication: Resource Requirement·Total: 0.50·Distinguished
– Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing
compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are
used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.·Proficient – Uses
the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the
reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.·Basic – Uses less
than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be
scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the
assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.·Below Expectations
– Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support
for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference
page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not
formatted correctly.·Non-Performance
– The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described
in the instructions.

GET HELP WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT TODAY

Clicking on this button will take you to our custom assignment page. Here you can fill out all the additional details for this particular paper (grading rubric, academic style, number of sources etc), after which your paper will get assigned to a course-specific writer. If you have any issues/concerns, please don't hesitate to contact our live support team or email us right away.

How It Works        |        About Us       |       Contact Us

© 2018 | Intelli Essays Homework Service®

Back To Top