skip to Main Content
The smarter way
to do assignments.

Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment posted on our website by one of our clients. If you need assistance with this question too, please click on the Order button at the bottom of the page to get started.

Presentation Peer Review: Presenter and Participants Presenter(s): By Day 7 of Week 2 Post your 7– to 10–slide PowerPoint presentation to the Discussion 2 – Week 3 thread. Participants: By Day 3 of Week 3 Upon review and consideration of the Presenter’s PowerPoint presentation, and based on your own research, respond to your assigned presentation in an edited 3–paragraph, formal academic peer review. Now, position yourself in support of one of these alternatives for growth and organizational capability, and identify whether they are restricted to large organizations only, or are they readily applicable to organizations regardless of size? Explain your rationale and support your position. In your review, be sure to: Assess the conceptualization, analysis, and synthesis of key research concepts presented. Determine whether or not the presentation provides a cohesive summary of the assigned concepts with an effective evaluation of their implications for human resources. Assess whether or not the Presenter made a meaningful academic argument or interpretation that demonstrated fluency with the material. An annotated bibliography of at least five additional resources related to the research topic. In the subject line of your reply, replace the text with “Your First Name Last Name’s Response to First Name Last Name’s Presentation” (for example, “Jeff Smith’s Response to Melissa Gore”). This will ensure it is easily identifiable by your Instructor and your colleagues. Presenter(s) and Participants: Between Day 3 and Day 7 of Week 3, continue the Discussion on both the Participants’ and Presenter(s)’ postings by addressing the following summative considerations that pertain specifically to the topics for this 2–week unit: In what ways do the readings, provided in this week’s Learning Resources and those identified by you and your colleagues, answer important “so what?” questions in the field of human resources? How are these readings potentially valuable for research in the field? Are there any important gaps (i.e., contradictions, arguments, disagreements, or areas of divergence) within this set of readings that point to potential topics for future research? How would you follow up to extend or explore these gaps? Looking [Back &] Ahead: This Discussion should inform your work on Section 2 of your Final Paper. Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message. By Day 7 of Week 2 Post your 7– to 10–slide PowerPoint presentation to the Discussion 2 – Week 3 thread. Participants: By Day 3 of Week 3 Upon review and consideration of the Presenter’s PowerPoint presentation, and based on your own research, respond to your assigned presentation in an edited 3–paragraph, formal academic peer review. Now, position yourself in support of one of these alternatives for growth and organizational capability, and identify whether they are restricted to large organizations only, or are they readily applicable to organizations regardless of size? Explain your rationale and support your position. In your review, be sure to: Assess the conceptualization, analysis, and synthesis of key research concepts presented. Determine whether or not the presentation provides a cohesive summary of the assigned concepts with an effective evaluation of their implications for human resources. Assess whether or not the Presenter made a meaningful academic argument or interpretation that demonstrated fluency with the material. An annotated bibliography of at least five additional resources related to the research topic. In the subject line of your reply, replace the text with “Your First Name Last Name’s Response to First Name Last Name’s Presentation” (for example, “Jeff Smith’s Response to Melissa Gore”). This will ensure it is easily identifiable by your Instructor and your colleagues. Presenter(s) and Participants: Between Day 3 and Day 7 of Week 3, continue the Discussion on both the Participants’ and Presenter(s)’ postings by addressing the following summative considerations that pertain specifically to the topics for this 2–week unit: In what ways do the readings, provided in this week’s Learning Resources and those identified by you and your colleagues, answer important “so what?” questions in the field of human resources? How are these readings potentially valuable for research in the field? Are there any important gaps (i.e., contradictions, arguments, disagreements, or areas of divergence) within this set of readings that point to potential topics for future research? How would you follow up to extend or explore these gaps?

GET HELP WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT TODAY

Clicking on this button will take you to our custom assignment page. Here you can fill out all the additional details for this particular paper (grading rubric, academic style, number of sources etc), after which your paper will get assigned to a course-specific writer. If you have any issues/concerns, please don't hesitate to contact our live support team or email us right away.

How It Works        |        About Us       |       Contact Us

© 2018 | Intelli Essays Homework Service®

Back To Top